The Fed Express!

The Fed Express!

Tuesday 31 January 2012

The greatest Grand Slam achievement?

After attempting to recuperate from this gargantuan, phenomenal and heroic marathon-like encounter between two greats of the modern game, and now two greats in the sport's history, a thought struck me: Has a player ever won a major in such spectacular fashion?

Wor
ld number one Novak Djokovic retained the Australian Open title on Sunday in a titanic struggle with Rafael Nadal who just does not understand the word 'surrender'. From two sets to one down, the Spaniard depicted a dejected figure as he strode to his chair, shoulders slumped, whilst his boisterous opponent jogged to his corner with his fists pumping, chest bumping male bravado oh so plain to see.
However as so often is the case with 'El matador', he does not know when he is beaten. He would have perhaps been forgiven after being on the receiving end of another 4 set defeat to his great rival after succumbing to six straight defeats in 2011, but obviously the Spaniard was undeterred. Testament to the Spanish bull, by saving three break points in a row and trailing 5-3 in the 4th set tiebreak, Nadal roared back and took a marathon 4th set in almost 90 minutes of compelling tennis. In heartbreaking fashion however, Rafa eventually surrendered a 4-2 lead and was denied once more by the Serb in their first five set encounter in just under 6 hours. Perhaps the greatest competitor and fighter the sport has ever seen, he too was a winner today, despite receiving his 3rd straight Grand Slam runners up trophy to Djokovic, he will believe he can stop the rot. I myself am not so sure.

What makes the feat even more impressive is by claiming his fifth Grand Slam title, Novak had to endure two monstrous five setters with a combined length of over ten hours in just three days defeating the 4th and 2nd seeds. Questions over his physical we
ll-being were raised after struggling through a hamstring strain and breathing problems in the two encounters against the dogged David Ferrer and warrior-like veteran that is Lleyton Hewitt in the quarter finals and round of 16 respectively. His indomitable spirit was thoroughly tested in consecutive matches. After initially overthrowing Murray in a 5 set classic and then overcoming Nadal in the longest Grand Slam final ever and the longest match in Australian Open history, a stunning accomplishment that may never be rivalled. 

When broken down individually, former legends of the game such as Borg, McEnroe, Sampras and the current crop of Federer and Nadal can all boast glittering careers with a combined total of 58 Grand Slams, a staggering total but which one stood out for each as their greatest against all the odds. In chronological order, Bjorn Borg's, affectionately known as the 'Ice Man', standout moment culminated in what many claim was the greatest match ever in the 1980 Wimbledon Final.
However comparing this to Novak's achievement, Borg's road to the fina
l involved encounters with just one seeded player but impressively had dropped just one set on the way to the final. Whereas Novak had to battle niggling injuries, match deficits and exhaustion especially in the 5th set of the final which was capitalised by this stunning and enthralling 31 shot exchange. (1.http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/16780204.stm)
Consequently, with the conclusion of this point Djokovic collapsed to the floor and at the time the impression was that Nadal had struck the final blow, though this extraordinary sporting gladiator was undeterred and roared back into life to take the title 7-5 in the 5th set. Both were incredible achievements but in this instance, Djokovic's achievement in the tournament as a whole just eclipses Borg's endeavours in 1980 and his consecutive 5 set victories at Wimbledon in 1977 which deserves a honourable mentioning.

Once again by trawling back through the greats of the game, John McEnroe's phenomenal 1980 US open campaign where he saw off 10th seeded Ivan Lendl in 4 sets, then ousted his great rival, the gritty and tenacious Jimmy Connors in five before again having to endure five sets against world number one Bjorn Borg. This was a brilliant achievement, but due to today's game being so much more physically wearing on the body perhaps Novak's triumph ever so slightly pips it, nevertheless McEnroe played more sets on his road to victory and faced the 3rd and top seeds compared to Novak's 5th, 4th and 2nd. 

At the turn of the 1990's a 19 year old 'Pistol' Pete Sampras's first slam was on home soil in the US Open and may have been his most impressive of his grand total of 14. In his title winning escapades, Sampras as a 12th seed defeated in the final four rounds, the 6th, 3rd, an unseeded John McEnroe and 4th seed Andre Agassi in the final with a combined set count of 16 in four rounds, just 1 set short of Novak's total.

Finally, in the glittering careers of Roger Federer and Rafae
l Nadal their greatest achievements have been against one another. The Spaniard's first Slam on his beloved clay transpired in Rafa winning the epic 2008 Wimbledon Final and ending Federer's five year stranglehold at SW19, a great feat. Worthy adversary, Roger Federer's fondest Slam victory arguably happened just a year before, at the same stage by eventually disposing with the up and coming Spanish pretender in five fantastic sets, proving he was still the man to beat bar on clay.
Conversely, neither of these endured an energy sapping run to the final as Federer and especially Rafa achieved in the 2009 French Open and the 2009 Australian Open for Nadal respectively. From the jaws of defeat, Federer, in the 4th round and then battling through a five setter in the semi's before finally achieving the elusive career Grand Slam.
However Rafa's epic Aussie Open triumph just a few months before was extremely reminiscent of Novak's conquest this time round as both had to endure a semi final and final that lasted just below and beyond 10 hours of play. Furthermore with their opponent enjoying an extra days rest to recover for the final and to achieve this feat against Federer in 2009 and Nadal in 2012, is a phenomenal record and according to the Serb "Wimbledon is right up there because it is the tournament I always wanted to win. But this comes out on top." (2.http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/16782987.stm

'This comes out on top'. That statement might just encompass every Grand Slam conquest in my opinion. Perhaps this heroic accomplishment tops all of them in achieving success in the face of adversity, steeped against such physically gruelling and talented players in one of the greatest era's the sport has ever known. It is difficult to gauge what is the greatest as each has their own case, but in a physical sense Novak Djokovic stands alone and it will take an extraordinary effort to usurp this, 'The Greatest of Slam achievements'.


References:

Sunday 15 January 2012

Football has no place at the Olympic Games.

With the unveiling of the London 2012 Olympics less than two hundred days away from it's grand inauguration, an electrifying excitement has gripped me as we collectively prepare for the greatest sporting spectacle on the planet. However it has experienced its fair share of nuisances and grievances, chiefly as a result of the fiasco with applying for Olympic tickets and the staggering costs to host the games. After scrolling through the list of sporting events on offer, my distaste for one event in particular that has no place at the Games is Football.

The worst Olympic logo ever?
As a life long Leeds United supporter, my love of the game in a domestic sense will never cease, however footballers are involved in competitions domestically, across Europe and also are committed in playing for their countries in an attempt to qualify for the likes of the European Championships and of course the World Cup, almost spoilt for choice. 
Most athletes besides that of football, are not granted the pleasures of lucrative weekly contracts, money-spinning sponsorship's and super-stardom. Day in, day out British athletes such as Mo Farah, Jessica Ennis and Dai Greene, to name but a few, are in a never ending pursuit for perfection and that elusive, taunting motivator that is the prize above all others, an Olympic gold medal.
For four years, not every week, these athletes train for this solitary goal and nothing else. The life of less successful athletes is a trying and testing one, with the the threat of funding cuts lurking over them, success is not only something to be cherished but also a means to make a living.
World 400m Hurdle champion Dai Greene
These concerns are conveniently echoed by 400m Hurdling World Champion Dai Greene who states football 'shouldn't be there in the first place' and fervently hopes that these world renowned sporting stars 'don't overshadow those people who train for four years for that one moment'.
(1 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport)
For that 'one' moment. Days, turn into weeks, weeks turn into months, months blend into years until finally these athletes have, in Dai Greene's case, less than a minute to reach for glory or wallow in the disaster of defeat. Each and every athlete at the Olympics has earned their place to participate in the highlight of their careers, surely football players have not and according to Dai Greene most athletes would agree with him.
Where would a gold medal rank for a football player such as Barcelona's Xavier Hernandez? The former Ballon d'Or contender's considerable trophy haul continues to grow after adding another World Club Championship Trophy to the likes of 6 La Liga's, 3 Champions League titles, the 2008 European Championships and there is one more small accolade I am forgetting..... ahh yes, the inconsequential World Cup to boot, not forgetting a host of individual honours.
'Olympic champion'... it does have an attractive ring to it doesn't it? Maybe that is all it is to a football player, 'Another notch on your belt' that may provide more support in their attempts to be considered an all time great.
Gareth Bale unveiling the
 GB football kit
Surely there is no greater honour in sport than representing your nation or indeed Britain at a monumental spectacle such as an Olympic Games or a World Cup. Personally I think the two should never mix and perhaps that goes for other sports such as Tennis and Basketball who compete for the best part of a year but that is another debate for another time.
Of course football players and fans alike will disagree and claim that football and the players have a right to be part of the Olympics and attempt to push their country higher up the medal rostrum. You can understand where they are coming from and the lure of playing in an Olympic Games is just too tempting an offer to snub, especially as they will be cheered on by millions on home soil. The likes of Gareth Bale, Aaron Ramsey and most notably David Beckham have all ventured a keen interest in having a Team GB for football and you can't blame them. 

Torchbearer David Beckham
Furthermore, Olympic football can provide a great opportunity for the younger players, who may be on the cusp of their national squads, to stake their claim for a prolonged spot and of course a chance to win a medal for their country. It has helped to unearth future international stars such as Eto'o, Ronaldinho and Xavi in 2000, Tevez, Mascherano and De Rossi in 2004 and finally Aguero, Di Maria and Pato but did this have a great effect on their future careers?
Back to the matter at hand. Is this what football fans around the world clamour for? Effectively the ruling that only 3 players can be over 23 means that it might as well be GB u-23 team vs Nigeria's u-23's for example. Moreover, football was one of just three sports that hasn't sold its allocation with approximately 1.5 million of 2 million available for the men's and women's matches at Wembley, Millennium Stadium and the Ricoh Arena to name but a few. (2. http://www.worldfootballinsider.com) 
This will be the 25th time Football has been incorporated into the Olympics and this point perhaps would have only been relevant for the last two decades, when transfer fees and contracts began to sky rocket. A footballer doesn't dream from a young age of winning an Olympic medal, rather an FA Cup or a World Cup but an athlete has and always will which is why it seems the current crop of footballers are there to somewhat 'crash the party' or 'jump on the bandwagon'. There is no doubt there are both reasons for and against its contribution, though I am certainly a supporter of the latter.

Long term Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger declared, emitting a sense of ridicule, that 
“It cannot work,".
"The Olympics finish in mid-August so imagine a player who has played the Euros and Olympic Games. You think you can use him after that? It’s impossible. I don’t know what people think when they organise these competitions." (3. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport). Strong words from a credible source who understands the 'beautiful game' in abundance.
Further support emanated from former Badminton Silver medalist player Gail Emms who tweeted in a response to Dai Greene's interview, 'You were spot on. Totally agree football shouldn't be in the Olympics. So wrong.' (4. http://martingough22.wordpress.com)
A final word from Dai Greene, who has had an exceptional year and deserves nothing but praise for his achievements, even has time for another little jab at football. Green believes that, 'When an athlete wins a medal, they want it to be about themtheir hard work and their story to get there,whereas the papers may be more interested in what David Beckham had for breakfast'. An honest, hardworking, good-humoured and exceptional athlete who I couldn't agree more with!


References:
1) http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/wales/15813277.stm
2) http://www.worldfootballinsider.com/Story.aspx?id=34515
3) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/8848253/London-2012-Olympics-debate-football-should-not-be-an-Olympic-sport.html
4) 
http://martingough22.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/should-football-be-part-of-olympic-programme/

Tuesday 10 January 2012

England 2005 vs England 2012?

After recently watching, with a great deal of pleasure, two of a select handful of the greatest English Ashes triumphs in their history; the conquering heroes of 2005 and the ruthless and efficient demolition England delivered to the Aussies down under in '10/11. There are stark contrasts between the two, firstly 2005 (commonly touted as the best ever) had everything in terms of drama, comebacks, minuscule victories and games teetering on a knife edge. Coincidentally, and perhaps unexpectedly, the margins of victory in the 2010/2011 Ashes were vast.

Undoubtedly both were monumental achievements to cherish. Firstly, in 2005 the Australian team had dominated the top of the rostrum for the best part of a decade in a side that contained world class talent in every position, yet England somehow prevailed against the Aussie heavyweights of Warne, Mcgrath, Ponting, Gilchrist and Lee, it was an incredible accomplishment. The same could be said for the most recent Ashes series, as England retained the ashes for the first time since 1986 by overwhelming their Aussie counterparts with a comprehensive 3-1 series win. Furthermore, what was so impressive was the exuberance shown as well as the confidence and efficiency in toppling this Aussie side, despite this team being a shadow of their great predecessors, was very impressive.

The question that comes to the forefront of my mind is whether or not this present English squad are superior to the 2005 version. Would have either side been capable of accomplishing what the other memorably achieved if they'd exchanged roles? England are now at the zenith of the Test rankings, quite an achievement in itself, whereas in 2005 England were an admirable, but very distant second, but on their day who was greater?

On a side-note, Test cricket no longer possesses the brilliance of a 1970's and 80's West Indian team or the all conquering Australians either side of the 21st century. This was extremely evident when India, the number one team in the world, toured these shores and returned home devoid of ambition, leadership and most important of all without a single victory in every format of the game after being mauled by a good, but far from a great England side. South Africa are always a threat and as they recently demonstrated with a colossal bowling performance to oust the Aussies for an abysmal 49, though they themselves were ousted for just 96 though went onto win the test, but like India will greatly suffer when their great experienced players retire in the not so distant future.

So England 2005 vs England 2012 who wins?

Saturday 7 January 2012

Djokovic's most important and confidence boosting wins over Nadal in 2011?


A remarkable season of tennis, especially for Novak, has drawn to a close and inevitably a time of reflection ensues. 
A dominating 6-0 head to head this season has left a visibly shaken and deflated Rafa pondering how on earth he can beat his great rival. In their meetings the physicality on display has been brutal to the point where at the US Nadal could barely walk! But what was the most important victory for Novak over Rafa in 2011?
There are several ways to determine this in order of importance so here goes.
1) Indian wells: 4-6 6-3 6-2 - Novak's first victory over Rafa in 2011. After initially struggling against the Spaniard, the Serb found his game superbly and played magnificently, especially in the final set, to overpower Nadal. It could be argued this was a sign of things to come as he went toe to toe with the world no1 and appeared to find a balance between consistency, aggression and tactical astuteness. This laid the foundations for his wins over Rafa as he found a game plan to regularly beat him. 
Verdict: Though it was important, I believe this wasn't a defining victory for Novak and was perhaps the least important of his 2011 wins.

2) Miami: 4-6 6-3 7-6(3)
 - This proved that his previous victory was no fluke and incredibly outlasted Nadal in conditions that favoured Nadal on a slow court with high temperatures. Despite a first set wobble Novak again came from a set down to register his 2nd straight victory over Rafa and in another masters 1000 final. It is one thing to have a plan to defeat someone, but to execute it consistently is an entirely different matter and once again Novak came up with the shots at crucial times, whereas Rafa appeared to go into his shell after gaining a lead in the tiebreak. Novak had proven he was the best hard-court player, but not many believed he would succeed on the Spaniard's beloved clay.

Verdict: This for me was one of the most important victories of the year for Novak as he 'out Nadaled Nadal' and this gave him even more confidence heading toward the clay court season. Furthermore in hindsight, Rafa played some of his best tennis in the week for Miami, so for Novak again to put him to the sword is an extremely impressive feat.

3) Madrid: 7-5 6-4 - IMO this was the best display of Novak's backhand prowess i have ever seen. It was also his first clay court victory over Nadal which is perhaps one of the greatest tasks there is in tennis. After taking a 4-0 lead with metronomic ball striking and precision Rafa fought back but was unable to prevent the Serbinator from taking the first set and despite one of the best shots of the year, (Nadal's lob tweener) Novak broke straight back after losing serve in the 2nd before bullying Nadal into his first victory on the dirt. Despite being broken a few times, Novak always seemed in control creating 12 break point opportunities, which was coincidentally double the amount Nadal posted.
Verdict: His first ever win over the Spaniard on clay and only Rafa's 17th loss on the surface. But this year Madrid was lightning fast and perhaps didn’t suit Rafa's game as well, but nonetheless a stunning victory, totally deserved and no doubt one of the biggest victories Novak has ever registered.

4) Rome: 6-4 6-4 - Perhaps the most comprehensive of all Novak's 2011 victories over Rafa. 'Brutal dominance', to quote a YouTube uploader, perfectly describes his victory here. Rafa had no excuses, no answers, no game plan to combat Novak's prowess here. Rafa tried fruitlessly to find a solution but all were met with an iron fist and quashed into submission. Rafa created just 3 BP's compared to Novak's 11 and hit just 15 winners to 22 UE's. What made the result even more astounding was the fact Novak seemed to be unaffected by the previous night's marathon match against Andy Murray and the Spaniard was on a much more favourable surface and yet Novak still pulled it out.
Journalists such as Jonathon Overend and the guardian's Kevin Mitchell believed this was the most important victory as not only did it show Novak could consistently beat Rafa on hard and now clay, was the fact that never before had Nadal been made to look so powerless to find the remedy to beat Djokovic.
Verdict: In terms of the manner of the win this was the most convincing but had the groundwork already been made before this win? A fantastic result nonetheless and proved Rafa is not quite invincible on the red stuff but was it the most important? I'm not sure.

5) Wimbledon: 6-4 6-1 1-6 6-3 - With Novak's no1 ranking already assured by his run to the final, pride was at stake for Rafa but once again Novak would not be denied. The 2nd set in particular was phenomenal as Novak didn't put a foot wrong and bulldozed a perplexed defending champion. Despite his concentration going awry in the 3rd he regained his composure to seal his first Wimbledon triumph which meant Novak had beaten on every surface the tour had to offer (bar indoor). Secondly nobody had ever beaten Nadal five times in a row (Davydenko four times) which is a monumental feat in itself and put a clear gap between the Djoker and the rest of the field. Perhaps more significantly was the fact that Novak had finally snapped his 5 match losing streak in Grand Slam matches against Nadal, a huge feat to get that particular monkey off his back.

Verdict: Proved he can win on any surface and Nadal appeared nonplussed at times and withdraw into his shell on the big moments with uncharacteristic errors becoming more frequent. The best moment of the Serb's career but in terms of victories over Nadal in importance for the rest of the year and in the future, again I believe it wasnt the most important but it was in terms of legacy as he had won his first slam away from Australia.

6) US Open: 6-2 6-4 (3)6-7 6-1 - Both men gave everything they had to offer in an exhausting display of stamina, power and a never say die attitude. Rafa could barely run in the final set, yet still gave his all, but ultimately it showed just how hard he had to work to win just one set against Djokovic 2.0. Though he accumulated 2-0 leads in both the first and second set he was unable to secure the breaks he had made and eventually lost to Djokovic who received treatment on his shoulder and back (which later caused him to miss 6 weeks of the tour, something he never quite recovered from). Nadal seemed more positive in most of his other interviews after a defeat to Novak and he made a fantastic effort despite his serve deserting him not giving him the free points he received in abundance in the 2010 US Open.
Verdict: His first US Open win at the 3rd attempt, his 6th win over Nadal in a remarkable season but not the most significant of his 2011 Rafa victories, but had Nadal won his self belief and confidence would have grown so by out muscling his opponent, the Spaniard cut a dejected figure for quite some time.

Overall Verdict (Most important wins in order): Numbers (confidence) letters (importance)
1) Miami (d)
2) Rome (e)
3) Wimbledon (a)
4) Madrid (c)
5) US Open (b)
6) Indian Wells (f)
What are your thoughts?